01
апр
Ok, I have a normal harddisk, so this might be my problem. I need to find another machine where I have full control, maybe it makes a difference. Good day Erich, I used both the online and offline installer. Load freescale codewarrior license crack. I think it might be the virus scanner, but I cannot switch it off on my machine as per the security policy of my IT departement. I’m still thinking that something in my system slows down the thousands of files the installer is writing.
Would be a Creative Sound Blaster Audigy FX a noticable change over my. I'm also using Daniel Kawakami's latest improved Audigy drivers from here:. I was able to use this card with creative Daniel's K SB X-Fi Series Support Pack 4.0 drivers and the card and the associated creative software.
Driver modder Daniel Kawakami or better known as Creative's Daniel_K is backing off his deal with providing modded software for all Creative sound cards for free. After receiving second warning mail from Creative threatening him with legal actions, he is finally 'gone for good'. He has posted a message over at the informing everyone for his decission. Leave your thoughts here, and tell us what do you think.
Daniel Kawakami I've received another cease and desist e-mail. I'm done with Creative, enough is enough. Don't even bother asking me for the files. Tkpenalty said: SIGH.
Profit minded Creative are set to get deflated by ASUS pretty soon if they keep this up. Its basically the same as making overclocking illegal. No see my above post. The legality of this isnt even close to being ambiguous. It breaks the EULA. Imagine if Daniel K had been offering his drivers for money?
People would obviously be furious and have no sympathy for him. However, ask yourself, why does this suddenly become legal if he gives his drivers away for free?
Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 17:09. Ghost101 said: No see my above post. The legality of this isnt even close to being ambiguous. It breaks the EULA. Imagine if Daniel K had been offering his drivers for money? People would obviously be furious and have no sympathy for him.
However, ask yourself, why does this suddenly become legal if he gives his drivers away for free? I think omega drivers are still out there? I get beta bios drivers all the time, wonder who makes them? Creative is off my list of anything. And everyone I know will be linked to that forum when they ask me what mp3,sound card,speakers they should buy. I wont support people who dont support us. ALLEN Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 17:35.
Pagalms said: Or something from Auzentech:) Auzentech chip is made by Creative! Creative built their damn X-fi chip, and licenses certain functionality only for Auzentech, Daniel_k also unlocked that functionality for standard Creative X-FI, that is one of the main reasons why Creative is so aggresive. They said that current X-FI wont work on Vista properly because of 'hardware issues' so they are working on X-FI 2 that is 'tailored' for it. Daniel_k prooved that there is nothing incompatible about the hardware, hence Creative is now pissed about being caught lying.:mad: Anyway I'll be damned if I ever buy Creative products again. I hope they go bankrupt before the fiscal year ends.
Edit: I belive that Creative could easily make drivers for Vista, maybe even better than daniel_k's, it's just that they arent realy making a lot of profit if people cling to their old hardware. I am perfectly satisified with my current Audigy 1 blaster, hell Creative have excelent hardware, but their profiteering ways made me not EVER want to buy a Creative product again.
Asus Xonar here I come. Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 18:48. Just my $.02 for starters, we can't compare ATI or nVidia's or any other comapny allowing users to get away with 'cracking' their hardware to Creative. As stated before, the technologies are Creative's property, and it's their call what's allowable, and what's not - doesn't matter if it's 3rd party drivers or not. It makes no difference if other companies allow users to unlock features - that's their call.
And if enabled features allow access to things that are supposed to be disabled due to any legal agreements between Creative and other companys. Keep in mind as well that in the audio market, people hold on to audio cards for overly long periods of time - even after product support has reached EOL, there are still many users who won't give them up - in their mind, the card still works, still sounds good, why purchase another? There are still users out there running Live! Initial-release cards (that dates back to 1998).
What other type of 10-year old hardware in any of our systems can we utilize to run current applications and software? This is where I can kind of see Creative's stand, if they don't start locking and disabling features, users will never move up to newer hardware, and the company could risk losing money as well. And about this: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:25:44 +0000 From: To: Subject: Stop the redistribution of Creative software Hi Daniel, Please stop the redistribution of any Creative software, otherwise we will take legal action against you. Creative Labs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------there's still no word yet if this last statement from Creative to Daniel is even official, and he has mentioned so himself in the OP on their forums. It could be someone just trying to prank him - I would imagine that if the message were legit, it would be more long winded than just one sentence, and wouldn't sound so abrupt. Also, if it were from Creative, I'd imagine that there'd be a signature or at least a name at the bottom of the message, and a link back to the companies main site or the email of the signee - not a link back to the Creative Forums.
Ok, I have a normal harddisk, so this might be my problem. I need to find another machine where I have full control, maybe it makes a difference. Good day Erich, I used both the online and offline installer. Load freescale codewarrior license crack. I think it might be the virus scanner, but I cannot switch it off on my machine as per the security policy of my IT departement. I’m still thinking that something in my system slows down the thousands of files the installer is writing.
Would be a Creative Sound Blaster Audigy FX a noticable change over my. I'm also using Daniel Kawakami's latest improved Audigy drivers from here:. I was able to use this card with creative Daniel's K SB X-Fi Series Support Pack 4.0 drivers and the card and the associated creative software.
Driver modder Daniel Kawakami or better known as Creative's Daniel_K is backing off his deal with providing modded software for all Creative sound cards for free. After receiving second warning mail from Creative threatening him with legal actions, he is finally 'gone for good'. He has posted a message over at the informing everyone for his decission. Leave your thoughts here, and tell us what do you think.
Daniel Kawakami I've received another cease and desist e-mail. I'm done with Creative, enough is enough. Don't even bother asking me for the files. Tkpenalty said: SIGH.
Profit minded Creative are set to get deflated by ASUS pretty soon if they keep this up. Its basically the same as making overclocking illegal. No see my above post. The legality of this isnt even close to being ambiguous. It breaks the EULA. Imagine if Daniel K had been offering his drivers for money?
People would obviously be furious and have no sympathy for him. However, ask yourself, why does this suddenly become legal if he gives his drivers away for free?
Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 17:09. Ghost101 said: No see my above post. The legality of this isnt even close to being ambiguous. It breaks the EULA. Imagine if Daniel K had been offering his drivers for money? People would obviously be furious and have no sympathy for him.
However, ask yourself, why does this suddenly become legal if he gives his drivers away for free? I think omega drivers are still out there? I get beta bios drivers all the time, wonder who makes them? Creative is off my list of anything. And everyone I know will be linked to that forum when they ask me what mp3,sound card,speakers they should buy. I wont support people who dont support us. ALLEN Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 17:35.
Pagalms said: Or something from Auzentech:) Auzentech chip is made by Creative! Creative built their damn X-fi chip, and licenses certain functionality only for Auzentech, Daniel_k also unlocked that functionality for standard Creative X-FI, that is one of the main reasons why Creative is so aggresive. They said that current X-FI wont work on Vista properly because of 'hardware issues' so they are working on X-FI 2 that is 'tailored' for it. Daniel_k prooved that there is nothing incompatible about the hardware, hence Creative is now pissed about being caught lying.:mad: Anyway I'll be damned if I ever buy Creative products again. I hope they go bankrupt before the fiscal year ends.
Edit: I belive that Creative could easily make drivers for Vista, maybe even better than daniel_k's, it's just that they arent realy making a lot of profit if people cling to their old hardware. I am perfectly satisified with my current Audigy 1 blaster, hell Creative have excelent hardware, but their profiteering ways made me not EVER want to buy a Creative product again.
Asus Xonar here I come. Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 18:48. Just my $.02 for starters, we can't compare ATI or nVidia's or any other comapny allowing users to get away with 'cracking' their hardware to Creative. As stated before, the technologies are Creative's property, and it's their call what's allowable, and what's not - doesn't matter if it's 3rd party drivers or not. It makes no difference if other companies allow users to unlock features - that's their call.
And if enabled features allow access to things that are supposed to be disabled due to any legal agreements between Creative and other companys. Keep in mind as well that in the audio market, people hold on to audio cards for overly long periods of time - even after product support has reached EOL, there are still many users who won't give them up - in their mind, the card still works, still sounds good, why purchase another? There are still users out there running Live! Initial-release cards (that dates back to 1998).
What other type of 10-year old hardware in any of our systems can we utilize to run current applications and software? This is where I can kind of see Creative's stand, if they don't start locking and disabling features, users will never move up to newer hardware, and the company could risk losing money as well. And about this: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:25:44 +0000 From: To: Subject: Stop the redistribution of Creative software Hi Daniel, Please stop the redistribution of any Creative software, otherwise we will take legal action against you. Creative Labs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------there's still no word yet if this last statement from Creative to Daniel is even official, and he has mentioned so himself in the OP on their forums. It could be someone just trying to prank him - I would imagine that if the message were legit, it would be more long winded than just one sentence, and wouldn't sound so abrupt. Also, if it were from Creative, I'd imagine that there'd be a signature or at least a name at the bottom of the message, and a link back to the companies main site or the email of the signee - not a link back to the Creative Forums.
..." style="letter-spacing:inherit;">Daniel Kawakami Creative Drivers(01.04.2019)Ok, I have a normal harddisk, so this might be my problem. I need to find another machine where I have full control, maybe it makes a difference. Good day Erich, I used both the online and offline installer. Load freescale codewarrior license crack. I think it might be the virus scanner, but I cannot switch it off on my machine as per the security policy of my IT departement. I’m still thinking that something in my system slows down the thousands of files the installer is writing.
Would be a Creative Sound Blaster Audigy FX a noticable change over my. I'm also using Daniel Kawakami's latest improved Audigy drivers from here:. I was able to use this card with creative Daniel's K SB X-Fi Series Support Pack 4.0 drivers and the card and the associated creative software.
Driver modder Daniel Kawakami or better known as Creative's Daniel_K is backing off his deal with providing modded software for all Creative sound cards for free. After receiving second warning mail from Creative threatening him with legal actions, he is finally 'gone for good'. He has posted a message over at the informing everyone for his decission. Leave your thoughts here, and tell us what do you think.
Daniel Kawakami I've received another cease and desist e-mail. I'm done with Creative, enough is enough. Don't even bother asking me for the files. Tkpenalty said: SIGH.
Profit minded Creative are set to get deflated by ASUS pretty soon if they keep this up. Its basically the same as making overclocking illegal. No see my above post. The legality of this isnt even close to being ambiguous. It breaks the EULA. Imagine if Daniel K had been offering his drivers for money?
People would obviously be furious and have no sympathy for him. However, ask yourself, why does this suddenly become legal if he gives his drivers away for free?
Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 17:09. Ghost101 said: No see my above post. The legality of this isnt even close to being ambiguous. It breaks the EULA. Imagine if Daniel K had been offering his drivers for money? People would obviously be furious and have no sympathy for him.
However, ask yourself, why does this suddenly become legal if he gives his drivers away for free? I think omega drivers are still out there? I get beta bios drivers all the time, wonder who makes them? Creative is off my list of anything. And everyone I know will be linked to that forum when they ask me what mp3,sound card,speakers they should buy. I wont support people who dont support us. ALLEN Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 17:35.
Pagalms said: Or something from Auzentech:) Auzentech chip is made by Creative! Creative built their damn X-fi chip, and licenses certain functionality only for Auzentech, Daniel_k also unlocked that functionality for standard Creative X-FI, that is one of the main reasons why Creative is so aggresive. They said that current X-FI wont work on Vista properly because of 'hardware issues' so they are working on X-FI 2 that is 'tailored' for it. Daniel_k prooved that there is nothing incompatible about the hardware, hence Creative is now pissed about being caught lying.:mad: Anyway I'll be damned if I ever buy Creative products again. I hope they go bankrupt before the fiscal year ends.
Edit: I belive that Creative could easily make drivers for Vista, maybe even better than daniel_k's, it's just that they arent realy making a lot of profit if people cling to their old hardware. I am perfectly satisified with my current Audigy 1 blaster, hell Creative have excelent hardware, but their profiteering ways made me not EVER want to buy a Creative product again.
Asus Xonar here I come. Posted on Jun 8th 2008, 18:48. Just my $.02 for starters, we can't compare ATI or nVidia's or any other comapny allowing users to get away with 'cracking' their hardware to Creative. As stated before, the technologies are Creative's property, and it's their call what's allowable, and what's not - doesn't matter if it's 3rd party drivers or not. It makes no difference if other companies allow users to unlock features - that's their call.
And if enabled features allow access to things that are supposed to be disabled due to any legal agreements between Creative and other companys. Keep in mind as well that in the audio market, people hold on to audio cards for overly long periods of time - even after product support has reached EOL, there are still many users who won't give them up - in their mind, the card still works, still sounds good, why purchase another? There are still users out there running Live! Initial-release cards (that dates back to 1998).
What other type of 10-year old hardware in any of our systems can we utilize to run current applications and software? This is where I can kind of see Creative's stand, if they don't start locking and disabling features, users will never move up to newer hardware, and the company could risk losing money as well. And about this: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:25:44 +0000 From: To: Subject: Stop the redistribution of Creative software Hi Daniel, Please stop the redistribution of any Creative software, otherwise we will take legal action against you. Creative Labs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------there's still no word yet if this last statement from Creative to Daniel is even official, and he has mentioned so himself in the OP on their forums. It could be someone just trying to prank him - I would imagine that if the message were legit, it would be more long winded than just one sentence, and wouldn't sound so abrupt. Also, if it were from Creative, I'd imagine that there'd be a signature or at least a name at the bottom of the message, and a link back to the companies main site or the email of the signee - not a link back to the Creative Forums.
...">Daniel Kawakami Creative Drivers(01.04.2019)